1959 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2002 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1959 Ferrari 256 F1. (291 HP @ 8600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 Ferrari 256 F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1959 Ferrari 256 F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2002 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ferrari | Ford |
Model | 256 F1 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2580 mm |