1959 Fiat 1100 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1959 Fiat 1100. (43 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1959 Fiat 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 415 kg more than 1959 Fiat 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Fiat 1100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Fiat 1100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (174 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Fiat 1100. (73 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Fiat 1100. 2013 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1959 Fiat 1100 has manual transmission. 1959 Fiat 1100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Fiat 1100 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 50 L |