1959 Fiat 1500 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Fiat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Fiat 1500 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Fiat 1500 (79 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Fiat 1500 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1959 Fiat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Fiat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Fiat 1500. (109 Nm). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Fiat 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Fiat 1500 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | 1500 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2420 mm |