1959 Fiat 2100 vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Fiat 2100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Fiat 2100 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1959 Fiat 2100. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1959 Fiat 2100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 716 kg more than 1959 Fiat 2100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Fiat 2100. (144 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Fiat 2100.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Fiat 2100 | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 2100 | Clio |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2052 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 934 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |