1959 Fiat 750 vs. 2004 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2004 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Fiat 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Fiat 750 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Hyundai Matrix (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1959 Fiat 750. (41 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1959 Fiat 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 640 kg more than 1959 Fiat 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Fiat 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Fiat 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Hyundai Matrix (143 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Fiat 750. (54 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Fiat 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Fiat 750 | 2004 Hyundai Matrix | |
| Make | Fiat | Hyundai |
| Model | 750 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 61 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 64 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 585 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3290 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 72 L |
