1959 Fiat 750 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Fiat 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Fiat 750 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1959 Fiat 750. (41 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1959 Fiat 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1232 kg more than 1959 Fiat 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Fiat 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Fiat 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Fiat 750. (54 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Fiat 750.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Fiat 750 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | 750 | XTS |
Year Released | 1959 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 61 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 64 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 585 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3290 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2831 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 72 L |