1959 Ford 12 M vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1959 Ford 12 M is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 5,768 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 12 M | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Ford | Studebaker |
| Model | 12 M | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5768 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1530 mm |
