1959 Ford 12 M vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 1959 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 12 M | Space Runner |
Year Released | 1959 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |