1959 Ford 12 M vs. 1995 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1995 Holden Commodore is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Holden Commodore (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 1995 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | 12 M | Commodore |
Year Released | 1959 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |