1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 12 M | Ranger |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |