1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Honda Logo
To start off, 2002 Honda Logo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Logo (64 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Logo should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 1959 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 2002 Honda Logo | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | Logo |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1530 mm |