1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 12 M | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | 12 M | XJR |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
