1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2002 Mazda Tribute is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 2002 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 2002 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | Tribute |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |