1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Volkswagen Bora
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Bora is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Bora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Bora (116 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Bora should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 1959 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Bora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 2002 Volkswagen Bora | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | 12 M | Bora |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |