1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 12 M | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | 12 M | XK |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 4193 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1290 mm |
