1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2004 Mazda MPV is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MPV (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 1959 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 2004 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | MPV |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |