1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | Armada |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 2010 mm |