1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2004 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota RAV4 (145 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 2004 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Toyota RAV4 has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Toyota RAV4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 12 M | 2004 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | 12 M | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
