1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2005 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,350 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 12 M | 2005 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 12 M | L 200 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
