1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 1959 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 12 M | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | 12 M | Matrix |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |