1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2006 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2006 Nissan Micra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Micra (87 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 1959 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 12 M | 2006 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | Micra |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
