1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (229 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 12 M | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | 12 M | Commander |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
