1959 Ford 12 M vs. 2012 Nissan NV
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NV (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1959 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NV should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Nissan NV has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan NV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 12 M | 2012 Nissan NV | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 12 M | NV |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 6111 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 2131 mm |
