1959 Ford 17M vs. 1996 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1996 Fiat Siena is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 1996 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Siena weights approximately 185 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M.
Because 1959 Ford 17M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 17M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 1996 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | 17M | Siena |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1300 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |