1959 Ford 17M vs. 1996 Renault Fifties
To start off, 1996 Renault Fifties is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Ford 17M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Fifties (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Fifties should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Fifties weights approximately 460 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 1996 Renault Fifties | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 17M | Fifties |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 60 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |