1959 Ford 17M vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford 17M weights approximately 10 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1959 Ford 17M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 17M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 17M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 17M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 17M | SW-X |
Year Released | 1959 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |