1959 Ford 17M vs. 2000 Nissan Cefiro
To start off, 2000 Nissan Cefiro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Cefiro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Cefiro weights approximately 315 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Nissan Cefiro has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 17M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 17M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Nissan Cefiro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 2000 Nissan Cefiro | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 17M | Cefiro |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1500 mm |