1959 Ford 17M vs. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan

To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 1,896 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Magellan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (275 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan weights approximately 234 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Ford 17M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 17M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (310 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford 17M. (120 Nm). This means 2002 Volkswagen Magellan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford 17M. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan has automatic transmission and 1959 Ford 17M has manual transmission. 1959 Ford 17M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: