1959 Ford 17M vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (210 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 716 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (334 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford 17M. (120 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 17M | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 17M | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1697 cc | 3278 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 91.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.6 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1831 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 73 L |
