1959 Ford 17M vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 921 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford 17M. (120 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 17M | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 3949 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 395 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 2036 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |