1959 Ford 17M vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider weights approximately 60 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 17M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford 17M. (120 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 17M | Raider |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.6 mm | 77.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 12.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 83 L |