1959 Ford 17M vs. 2007 Holden UTE
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 298 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 410 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford 17M. (120 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 2007 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | 17M | UTE |
Year Released | 1959 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |