1959 Ford 17M vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Ford 17M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M.
Because 1959 Ford 17M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 17M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 17M | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2490 mm |