1959 Ford 17M vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1959 Ford 17M. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford 17M.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 17M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford 17M. (120 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford 17M.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 17M | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | 17M | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1697 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.6 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
