1959 Ford 17M vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher.
Because 1959 Ford 17M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 17M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford 17M | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | 17M | Leaf |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
