1959 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Honda Element
To start off, 2004 Honda Element is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford Fairlane (168 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Honda Element. (158 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda Element. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 495 kg more than 2004 Honda Element. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Honda Element is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Element will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Honda Element | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Fairlane | Element |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5769 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2094 kg | 1599 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2690 mm |