1959 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Pontiac Sunfire
To start off, 2004 Pontiac Sunfire is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford Fairlane (168 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Pontiac Sunfire. (140 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Pontiac Sunfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 839 kg more than 2004 Pontiac Sunfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Pontiac Sunfire, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Pontiac Sunfire | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Fairlane | Sunfire |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5769 cc | 2195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2094 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2650 mm |
