1959 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Kia Rio
To start off, 2005 Kia Rio is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford Fairlane (168 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2005 Kia Rio. (96 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 936 kg more than 2005 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Kia Rio | |
| Make | Ford | Kia |
| Model | Fairlane | Rio |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5769 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2094 kg | 1158 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2420 mm |
