1959 Ford Prefect vs. 2005 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2005 Nissan Micra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Prefect. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Prefect would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Micra (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1959 Ford Prefect. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Prefect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Micra weights approximately 243 kg more than 1959 Ford Prefect. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Ford Prefect is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Prefect. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Micra (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford Prefect. (72 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford Prefect.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford Prefect | 2005 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Prefect | Micra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 72 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 18.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 46 L |