1959 Ford Zephyr vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1959 Ford Zephyr. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Zephyr.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford Zephyr. (187 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford Zephyr | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Zephyr | Tundra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3270 mm |