1959 Ford Zodiac vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 808 kg more than 1959 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford Zodiac | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Ford | Mahindra |
Model | Zodiac | Armada |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4310 mm |