1959 Ford Zodiac vs. 2011 Ford F-350
To start off, 2011 Ford F-350 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 1959 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Zodiac.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-350 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford Zodiac. (188 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford Zodiac | 2011 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Zodiac | F-350 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3967 mm |