1959 Holden FC vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForFour (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1959 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FC.
Because 1959 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Holden FC (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1959 Holden FC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Holden FC | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Holden | Smart |
Model | FC | ForFour |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1123 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |