1959 Holden FC vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Ractis (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Holden FC. (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Ractis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Holden FC. 2006 Toyota Ractis has automatic transmission and 1959 Holden FC has manual transmission. 1959 Holden FC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Ractis will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Holden FC | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | FC | Ractis |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1299 cc |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
