1959 Holden FE vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1963 Pontiac Tempest is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 370 kg more than 1959 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Holden FE | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Holden | Pontiac |
| Model | FE | Tempest |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2930 mm |
