1959 Holden FE vs. 1968 MG MGB
To start off, 1968 MG MGB is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 MG MGB (97 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 MG MGB should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Holden FE weights approximately 100 kg more than 1968 MG MGB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Holden FE (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1959 Holden FE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Holden FE | 1968 MG MGB | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | FE | MGB |
Year Released | 1959 | 1968 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |