1959 Holden FE vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Holden FE weights approximately 128 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Holden FE (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Holden FE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Holden FE | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FE | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1973 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |