1959 Holden FE vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 1992 Renault Racoon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Holden FE (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Holden FE should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault Racoon weights approximately 25 kg more than 1959 Holden FE.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Holden FE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Holden FE (150 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 1959 Holden FE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Holden FE | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | FE | Racoon |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2770 mm |
