1959 Holden FE vs. 2000 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mahindra Bolero (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 800 kg more than 1959 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Holden FE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra Bolero (166 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Holden FE. (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Holden FE | 2000 Mahindra Bolero | |
Make | Holden | Mahindra |
Model | FE | Bolero |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1780 kg |