1959 Holden FE vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 406 kg more than 1959 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (183 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Holden FE. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Holden FE | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FE | Tribute |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 183 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2630 mm |